|
Post by sweep on Mar 28, 2019 9:54:47 GMT -6
If Coleman were good enough he’d have played during our “lack of depth” period. So either he’s not very good or we didn’t really lack depth.
With 20-20 hindsight he might have made a difference and produced some more wins.
Who exactly would Coleman have replaced on the floor to produce wins ? Coleman is an okayish ball handler and has a D1 frame, but I don't see how that wins any games.
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Mar 28, 2019 17:59:57 GMT -6
Better to have that in a very close game than what we sometimes got from our bench. Several losses we're razor thin margin. Maybe one play.
He'd have avoided a TO, made a defensive play. Given a starter a minutes rest without disaster. Grabbed a loose ball Nehls couldn't get. Got a rebound Josh couldn't. Very little required for us to have 3 more wins.
Maybe more.
|
|
|
Post by cardfan on Mar 28, 2019 18:13:40 GMT -6
Or none at all. Easy to play what if.
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Mar 28, 2019 19:12:37 GMT -6
Sure. Just what fan forums are for. Same thing about those who second guess every move made, and are sure some other way was there to win more.
|
|
|
Post by cardfan on Mar 28, 2019 19:17:52 GMT -6
It’s a win win.
|
|