Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2016 14:48:03 GMT -6
My annual rant on 11 seeds having to play an extra game to get into the regular NCAA tournament. Puts them at a distinct disadvantage vs. the field. I understand the back markers (16 seeds) but can't grasp this thinking.
No explanations necessary. I'm sure this can be explained away rationally. I won't embrace any potential logic around this. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Mar 15, 2016 17:18:47 GMT -6
It looks pretty stupid. Must be some reason we don't see.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2016 9:51:52 GMT -6
Vanderbilt was a "no show" last night (laid a huge egg), so we'll see during the Michigan game tonight whether 11th-seed play-ins are interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by williamtsherman on Mar 16, 2016 14:26:47 GMT -6
If you are looking for some help with your bracket, this guy is the best analyst I've ever seen.
link |
|
|
|
Post by proctorp on Mar 16, 2016 21:39:19 GMT -6
Tonight's games were craptastic. How did the Big 10 deserve 7 teams this year?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2016 5:49:01 GMT -6
Sorry to see Southern Cal get dumped. I was hoping to see Enfield's wife (former FGCU coach) get some TV exposure.
|
|
|
|
Post by williamtsherman on Mar 26, 2016 8:41:31 GMT -6
Suck it, IU fans.
Also, the Greg Doyle column about how the selection committee disrespected the Big 10 now makes for some amusing reading. link |
|
|
|
Post by cardfan on Mar 26, 2016 9:01:11 GMT -6
Turns out the Big 10 wasn't all that.
|
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Mar 26, 2016 13:42:40 GMT -6
Turns out the Big 10 wasn't all that. Coulda. Woulda. Shoulda. Each team in the top half was strong but flawed, so it's not a big surprise. I thought any hype for IU was especially overblown. The guy has not won big games. Purdue did not have guard play which is critical in tournament games. MSU I liked. Michigan is usually dangerous and can get hot but not as strong this year. |
|
