|
Post by coastalcard on Jul 28, 2023 4:45:57 GMT -6
We probably all saw that LeBron James' son had an episode of cardiac arrest a few days ago. www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/bronny-james-cardiac-arrest-update-lebron-james-son-at-home-after-usc-freshman-discharged-from-hospital/Here's what Dr. Peter McCullough, a leading American cardiologist, had to say about the incident: "Bronny James' 18-year-old USC teammate Vince Iwuchukwu collapsed on the court during a summer 2022 workout at the Galen Center. USC, who mandated COVID-19 vaccines for students, had training staff rush to shock his heart into normal rhythm and he later received an ICD and returned to playing. Now Bronny James himself, who attended Sierra Canyon high school where strict COVID-vaccine mandates were enforced, was reported to have a cardiac arrest and prompt recovery. LeBron James himself indicated that he and his family after doing their research were fully COVID-19 vaccinated. This was about three months after the US FDA put out myocarditis warnings on mRNA vaccines. We are seeing a wide range of vaccine associated collapses among on screen reporters, athletes, and many others that can be caused by POTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome) which has a benign prognosis all the way to myocarditis and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation which can be fatal. Details regarding the COVID-19 vaccine taken, when the doses were administered, the initial cardiac rhythm at the time of collapse followed by cardiac testing including ECG, blood tests, and MRI are all needed to ascertain the prognosis." My questions and concerns regarding the putative covid crisis/vacicines are rather complex; I spent 40 years of my life in the medical, diagnostics, and pharmaceutical industries. I have many questions/doubts, here are just a few: 1) Why did Pfizer (major covid vaccine producer) request 75 years before their clinical data (re. covid) be released? My last project before my position was eliminated (it happens) was the development of a drug to treat non-hodgkins lymphoma; all of our data had to to be available for review before moving to the next phase (i.i RD to development, then to clinical, etc.). If ant of our data were deficient it was a stop; before releases for sale the drug had to be approved by the FDA. What was Phizer's game? 2) During the so-called pandemic, why were there 98% fewer deaths due to flu than in previous years? Were those deaths attributed to covid? If so, why? 3) The confirmatory assay (PCR) for covid did not distinguish between the covid and flu virus; why? On purpose it was designed that way; in my time working in PCR, had I designed PCR primers that would not distinguish between those viruses, I would not have a viable diagnostic assay and probable cause for dismissal. Y'all are missing an important point: LeBron and his family did their research on the medical safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. I can only assume that GOOGLE and the government FaceBook posts provided significant input
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Jul 28, 2023 6:45:30 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by bsutrack on Jul 29, 2023 22:37:33 GMT -6
Damage to the heart is more common than thought after receipt of Moderna's COVID-19 booster, a new study indicates. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ejhf.2978One in 35 health care workers at a Swiss hospital had signs of heart injury associated with the vaccine, mRNA-1273, researchers found. “mRNA-1273 booster vaccination-associated elevation of markers of myocardial injury occurred in about one out of 35 persons (2.8%), a greater incidence than estimated in meta-analyses of hospitalized cases with myocarditis (estimated incidence 0.0035%) after the second vaccination,” the researchers wrote in the paper, published by the European Journal of Heart Failure. In a generally healthy population, the level would be about 1 percent, the researchers said. The group experiencing the adverse effects was followed for only 30 days, and half still had unusually high levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, an indicator of subclinical heart damage, at follow-up. The long-term implications of the study remain unclear as little research has tracked people over time with heart injury after messenger RNA vaccination, which is known to cause myocarditis and other forms of heart damage. “ According to current knowledge, the cardiac muscle can’t regenerate, or only to a very limited degree at best. So it’s possible that repeated booster vaccinations every year could cause moderate damage to the heart muscle cells,” University Hospital Basel professor Christian Muller, a cardiologist and the lead researcher, said in a statement.
|
|
|
Post by nazcard on Jul 29, 2023 23:51:47 GMT -6
"BREAKING: Robert Kadlec, former boss of Fauci and Head of Operation Warp Speed, reportedly stated that he and Fauci privately discussed how to “turn down the temperature” on accusations against China in the early days of the pandemic.
The cover-up was calculated. Fauci must be prosecuted".
Dr. Simone Gold @drsimonegold
Nothing to see here, move on, or something.
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Jul 30, 2023 8:47:36 GMT -6
Consider the source. Gold is prominent anti VAX leader convicted for role in Jan 6 I think.
|
|
|
Post by bsutrack on Jul 30, 2023 21:52:38 GMT -6
Repeated COVID-19 vaccination weakens the immune system, potentially making people susceptible to life-threatening conditions such as cancer, according to a new study. www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/11/5/991Multiple doses of the Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines lead to higher levels of antibodies called IgG4, which can provide a protective effect. But a growing body of evidence indicates that the “abnormally high levels” of the immunoglobulin subclass actually make the immune system more susceptible to the COVID-19 spike protein in the vaccines, researchers said in the paper. They pointed to experiments performed on mice that found multiple boosters on top of the initial COVID-19 vaccination “significantly decreased” protection against both the Delta and Omicron virus variants and testing that found a spike in IgG4 levels after repeat Pfizer vaccination, suggesting immune exhaustion. Studies have detected higher levels of IgG4 in people who died with COVID-19 when compared to those who recovered and linked the levels with another known determinant of COVID-19-related mortality, the researchers also noted. Dr. Robert Malone, who helped invent the technology, said the paper illustrates why he’s been warning about the negative effects of repeated vaccination. “I warned that more jabs can result in what’s called high zone tolerance, of which the switch to IgG4 is one of the mechanisms. And now we have data that clearly demonstrate that’s occurring in the case of this as well as some other vaccines,” according to Malone “So it’s basically validating that this rush to administer and re-administer without having solid data to back those decisions was highly counterproductive and appears to have resulted in a cohort of people that are actually more susceptible to the disease.” Possible Problems The weakened immune systems brought about by repeated vaccination could lead to serious problems, including cancer, the researchers said.But heck, repeated vaccinations and vaccinations to groups not at risk (healthy teenagers and young adults who later development myocardia), certainly made a lot of money for Pfizer and Moderna.
|
|
|
Post by nazcard on Jul 30, 2023 23:50:20 GMT -6
Well of course, why would anyone take an experimental drug containing mRNA, etc. or want their employees to take it? Unless there were alterior motives like, oh I don't know, maybe purposeful medical complications for the unsuspecting:
List of employers NOT requiring their employees to get vaccinated - 1. The White House 2. Congress & Staff 3. Supreme Court 4. The CDC 5. The FDA 6. The WHO 7. Moderna 8. Pfizer BioNTech 9. USPS Ballot Services 10. Covid Test Lab Industries + All Illegal Immigrant Invaders + Countless Hidden Elite Figures Nothing to see here, move along you heartless anti-vaxers, like me.
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Jul 31, 2023 10:32:11 GMT -6
Well of course, why would anyone take an experimental drug containing mRNA, etc. or want their employees to take it? Unless there were alterior motives like, oh I don't know, maybe purposeful medical complications for the unsuspecting: List of employers NOT requiring their employees to get vaccinated... Nothing to see here, move along you heartless anti-vaxers, like me. So you seriously believe there is "purposeful" inducement of medical issues? The material cited above is a cherry picked literature review indicating VERY small numbers of people possibly having problems. I'd conclude more study with actual data and controls MIGHT be indicated. Not proof here of any actual problem. A lot of could be and maybe. Certainly there is no evidence of malicious motive. Far more likely the gains of vaccine were the motive, and outweighs the risk, but I'd support more research. Why take vaccine with excellent actual safety record? Seems easy question. A motive to hurt people?
|
|
|
Post by nazcard on Aug 1, 2023 0:06:43 GMT -6
Try viewing the documentary "Died Suddenly" by Stew Peters; it documents hematological events related to the so-called vaccine and concomitant debilitating outcomes. Unfortunately, I am unable to offer a link as the corrupt media sources seem to be blocking and of course debunking. Why would that be happening?
"The truth said Diogenes is like light to the sore eyes".
OOhmh, I have nothing against you personally, however, my background in the medical community/biosciences tells me too many things are amiss. Just one point among may; in the 1990s Fauci published a paper wherein he touted Ivermectin as a potential wonder drug for treating cancers. OK, fair enough, why then did it (Ivermectin) become a 'not approved for human use' "horse dewormer" during the so-called pandemic? These things don't happen without a reason. By the way, don't waste time trying to find Fauci's publication as it appears to have been 'scrubbed', or whatever.
So yes, I do believe there were purposeful, cynical, and evil reasons associated with the 'vaccine'.
It would be very instructive for you to study the work of Dr. R.W. Malone; he is a foremost authority on the subject of mRNA and how it can adversely affect the human body when inappropriately used.
In all seriousness, peace be with you.
|
|
|
Post by Lurkin McGurkin on Aug 1, 2023 5:57:16 GMT -6
Big Pharma has very, very deep pockets, shareholders who also just so happen to be politicians, and Boards of Directors that are very well-connected (by blood or marriage). People go on about how Big Oil is so dangerous, but they're nothing compared to some of the shenanigans that pharmaceuticals have pulled. Used to be that the government would test each new drug extensively, before allowing it to be sold in the US. Now they rely on the companies to test it themselves, then report the results for approval. What could go wrong? FDA just "reviews the data"
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Aug 1, 2023 8:41:51 GMT -6
Used to be that the government would test each new drug extensively, before allowing it to be sold in the US. Now they rely on the companies to test it themselves, then report the results for approval. What could go wrong? FDA just "reviews the data" That's been true since 1962...The enabling legislation requires companies to provide data. The data collection is regulated and reviewed.
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Aug 1, 2023 9:59:41 GMT -6
nazcard, I don't know your path to becoming anti-vax or a conspiracy theorist, and I won't impugn your sincerity in the beliefs you state. But. I can't accept them as scientifically based. And it goes way to far to allege malign and evil intent to everyone who disagrees with those positions. I do not understand much of that community's tendency to believe the worst about respected scientists, while being willing to put their faith in people with suspect credentials. Try viewing the documentary "Died Suddenly" by Stew Peters; it documents hematological events related to the so-called vaccine and concomitant debilitating outcomes. Unfortunately, I am unable to offer a link as the corrupt media sources seem to be blocking and of course debunking. Why would that be happening? Stew Peters is a rather prominent purveyor of misinformation and conspiracy theory. There are numerous critiques of this documentary on the web.
OOhmh, I have nothing against you personally, however, my background in the medical community/biosciences tells me too many things are amiss. Just one point among may; in the 1990s Fauci published a paper wherein he touted Ivermectin as a potential wonder drug for treating cancers. OK, fair enough, why then did it (Ivermectin) become a 'not approved for human use' "horse dewormer" during the so-called pandemic? These things don't happen without a reason. By the way, don't waste time trying to find Fauci's publication as it appears to have been 'scrubbed', or whatever. So yes, I do believe there were purposeful, cynical, and evil reasons associated with the 'vaccine'. When someone cites an authority without evidence of its existence, based on an evil plot to conceal the truth, I have to discount that "evidence."
You make several statements that mislead.
Ivermectin was always accepted for human use in the formulations used for parasitic infections. The veterinarian formulations used in animals was NOT accepted for human use and the research on its lack of efficacy for Covid looks to me pretty convincing.
Having looked at Fauci's career and his publication record, I doubt seriously he ever published anything "touting" anything as a wonder drug. His AIDS research is well known and actually has been something of a wonder drug and it did not "tout" or sell anything. The Fauci research you allege to be concealed, not being able to be cited is troubling to me. Where did you actually see this? Did you read it? Or are you relying on second hand sources? What sources?
I have worked in the industry on intellectual property and contract matters in my career, my wife is a scientist and works with industry researchers. While I tend to agree there is plenty wrong with Big Pharma and the patent system and the economics of the industry, I simply can't agree the fringe sources you are citing have any great credibility or that the science in the pandemic was somehow corrupt. I do agree that science in the last few years of research on the virus was working in the unknown with data that was constantly being discovered which changed the recommendations and opinions on the fly. This strikes me as not all that unusual in science. As you know, scientific research is by design a process open to revision based on new information, not written in stone.
It would be very instructive for you to study the work of Dr. R.W. Malone; he is a foremost authority on the subject of mRNA and how it can adversely affect the human body when inappropriately used. I cannot agree. Malone is hardly the foremost authority, actually rather a minor figure in the research. From your post I expect you will reject anything that is "mainstream" or "establishment" journalism, but to maintain there is some vast conspiracy of all these sources to actually intend to hurt people just doesn't correspond to my experience dealing with the scientific community and the press that reports on science.
|
|
|
Post by villagepub on Aug 1, 2023 10:38:25 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by nazcard on Aug 1, 2023 23:55:39 GMT -6
00hmh I would have hoped for more of an insiteful rebuttal from you; citing "mainstream" media disqualifiefies anything that follows. Citing the NYtymes is just silly. The legitimate scientific community is quite different from the putative mainstream community which has sold its soul, and that's quite a price to pay (eternity is forever, you don't get a doever after death). Have a nice day and Jesus died on the cross for remittance of sins, both mine and yours. May peace be with you.
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Aug 2, 2023 0:22:44 GMT -6
The NYT article contained information. Respond to it, do not ignore it.
Your "leading authority" simply isn't accepted as such. By the scientific community. The NYT nails that.
I think I raised reasonable questions about allegations you made, and fear you are dodging those questions using the NYT as a red herring.
In particular the idea you double down on that there was malicious and intentional harm done is simply not supported even if some of the misinformation you offer had more credibility.
|
|