|
Post by 00hmh on Jul 4, 2017 16:28:05 GMT -6
The pacers draft is heavily dependent on 2 of those 3 choices recovering from injury.
Sumner was very highly thought of before the season, and might have been a first round choice or high second round without the injury. That he is the biggest gamble is more a matter of that injury and uncertainty than his T/O to Assist ratio.
Those second round choices are both a bit of a gamble, but I'd rather have the upside than get a player who was likely to be a bench player with little chance to ever start or play starters minutes. Easy to dump the player if he doesn't live up to first round form.
Out of Leaf, Anigbogu, Sumner and Sabonis any of them might become very good starters down the road. Dipo is already a pretty solid NBA player, but I was surprised how high he was picked and doubt he will be an all-star performer. Long term the pacers pick up 3 players this year who will be rotation players.
I suppose all of them could have good careers, but given all are gambles of one kind or other, perhaps 2 or 3 will make it long term in the league, perhaps one or two will live up to first round hype.
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Jul 5, 2017 12:05:35 GMT -6
Pacers lucky they didn't sign Paul GeorgeHmmm. The author does have a point. Or three. Is Paul George worth as much as Steph Curry? That's a supermax contract which may have been the only way they signed him. If he is worth that much, could they find the money without gutting the roster?
They would have rookies who are promising, and Myles Turner and 3 rookies who might be good, but could they afford to keep Teague, and others, or would it be Paul and the seven dwarves? Or would they be trusting Lance Stephenson, Monte Ellis and so on to be enough to win anything? Seems to me they made enough bonehead roster moves that they were not going to be a top East team. Assuming they signed him for all that money would his heart be in it?
I think they would have to retool the roster big time and probably have to do it on the cheap and somehow also produce a winner to have any chance, if he values winning, as he says. But assuming they did that, Paul George still would not be in LA and not have the media attention and outside income and other perks of the large market teams. And. If all that didn't happen soon, how happy is he when he realizes that if he were in LA they can afford to bring LeBron and other assets to join him. The Pacers would be all in with paying him. That's a long shot he gets what he wants.
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Dec 9, 2017 9:27:47 GMT -6
Pacers just beat the Cavs in Indy, and have had a surprisingly good season.
All the talk about being hosed in the Paul George trade look a little over done with the two players obtained doing very well here.
Longer term, they are looking good with good young talent and some cap room to add a player next year, no long term bad contract if Oladipo continues anything like this play.
|
|