|
|
Post by 00hmh on Jan 18, 2018 15:44:15 GMT -6
However it works, it will change college basketball, I think for the worse, accelerate and expand the ills of one and done which The big guys survive, but it's not pretty.
Year around a meat market, every coach permanently recruiting his own players and others, not coaching basketball.
|
|
|
|
Post by rmcalhoun on Jan 18, 2018 15:44:25 GMT -6
Schools could and will also makes deals... Hey you you want play at Michigan sign at CMU play 2 years then come to us
|
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Jan 18, 2018 16:36:11 GMT -6
Schools could and will also makes deals... Hey you you want play at Michigan sign at CMU play 2 years then come to us Yeah, but not enforceable deals...you think recruiting over a kid is prevalent now. Kids now who might sign and have 4 years are technically on 1 year renewable deals but usually honored for 4 years. The pressure will exist to just make them "one and done" much more often, and have to hunt for a transfer situation, or worse, have a bad year and no scholarship. Much less coaching and loyalty in the new environment. This is further and further away from college basketball, more and more just semipro competition with a rotating cast of hired guns... I cannot even imagine how they will measure APR or try to determine what academic program a kid is on, he will have to be on general studies to get all his credits to transfer and count on a lowest common denominator academic program at the next stop. I hate this idea. |
|
|
|
Post by TakeMeBackto2008 on Jan 18, 2018 17:09:25 GMT -6
I can't fathom why anybody would think this is a good idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by lmills72 on Jan 18, 2018 17:25:27 GMT -6
I'm thinking along the lines of Jackson Street. Wouldn't we have benefitted during Whitford's tenure with all the transfers we've taken.
On one hand, I doubt the big boys would ever redshirt anyone. A player who wanted to be a Hoosier, for example, say a guy like Zach Gunn, wound't have to redshirt or sit on the bench at IU. He could just go to BSU, or ISU, or IUPUI and play a year or two and, if his game improves and a spot opens up, he off to IU.
On the other hand, if the big boys aren't redshirting anyone, I can see more players of that level disgruntled with losing eligiblity while sitting on the pine.
Lots of ways this could turn out.
|
|
|
|
Post by gocardsgo on Jan 18, 2018 17:46:50 GMT -6
I think in basketball they will restrict the number of transfers a school can take. I think you have to. Otherwise a coach could restock his roster every year by taking a bunch of transfers rather than signing any 4 year players out of high school. It would just be a bunch of free agents looking for the highest bidder. Kids developed by mid majors with jyst bail as soon as they could Sfax the midmajor has to start over again. I'm concerned about you CF. Did you have a stroke at the end of this post? |
|
|
|
Post by cardfan on Jan 18, 2018 18:03:14 GMT -6
Damn. I must have. Was typing on phone and clearly wasn’t hitting the right letters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lurkin McGurkin on Jan 18, 2018 18:11:26 GMT -6
In case there was any doubt, money talks.
|
|
|
|
Post by rmcalhoun on Jan 18, 2018 19:37:30 GMT -6
Schools could and will also makes deals... Hey you you want play at Michigan sign at CMU play 2 years then come to us Yeah, but not enforceable deals...you think recruiting over a kid is prevalent now. Kids now who might sign and have 4 years are technically on 1 year renewable deals but usually honored for 4 years. The pressure will exist to just make them "one and done" much more often, and have to hunt for a transfer situation, or worse, have a bad year and no scholarship. Much less coaching and loyalty in the new environment. This is further and further away from college basketball, more and more just semipro competition with a rotating cast of hired guns... I cannot even imagine how they will measure APR or try to determine what academic program a kid is on, he will have to be on general studies to get all his credits to transfer and count on a lowest common denominator academic program at the next stop. I hate this idea. No they would never be binding but it will happen between coaches schools |
|
|
|
Post by gocardsgo on Jan 19, 2018 1:57:34 GMT -6
Yeah, but not enforceable deals...you think recruiting over a kid is prevalent now. Kids now who might sign and have 4 years are technically on 1 year renewable deals but usually honored for 4 years. The pressure will exist to just make them "one and done" much more often, and have to hunt for a transfer situation, or worse, have a bad year and no scholarship. Much less coaching and loyalty in the new environment. This is further and further away from college basketball, more and more just semipro competition with a rotating cast of hired guns... I cannot even imagine how they will measure APR or try to determine what academic program a kid is on, he will have to be on general studies to get all his credits to transfer and count on a lowest common denominator academic program at the next stop. I hate this idea. No they would never be binding but it will happen between coaches schools Like between a head coach at a P5 school such as Arizona and their former assistant who is now a head coach at a mid-major school? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2018 7:44:16 GMT -6
If there aren't good rules in place we would in essence become a feeder program. That would be a best case scenario. A current, how many players do we have a power six member would be interested in ? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2018 7:49:11 GMT -6
However it works, it will change college basketball, I think for the worse, accelerate and expand the ills of one and done which The big guys survive, but it's not pretty. Year around a meat market, every coach permanently recruiting his own players and others, not coaching basketball. What exactly is ill about "one and done" ? Also, every coach is already permanently recruiting and trying to keep his current players happy. Sheesh........... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2018 7:50:04 GMT -6
Schools could and will also makes deals... Hey you you want play at Michigan sign at CMU play 2 years then come to us Nope, I don't think any coach is going to assume the risk involved. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2018 7:52:30 GMT -6
Schools could and will also makes deals... Hey you you want play at Michigan sign at CMU play 2 years then come to us he will have to be on general studies to get all his credits to transfer and count on a lowest common denominator academic program at the next stop. That is absolute nonsense. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2018 8:39:08 GMT -6
If true, and the NCAA isn’t careful, screen door transferring will make the Adidas recruiting corruption look like a $1 scratch off ticket.
|
|
