|
Post by williamtsherman on Jan 19, 2023 21:00:32 GMT -6
Morris has a .360 winning percentage and has been let go from two head coaching jobs already. Maybe try someone who isn't a proven failure? Just thinking out loud.
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Jan 19, 2023 22:08:44 GMT -6
An option not give up anything to trade up. A year needed and maybe an experienced bridge QB with similar game if as expected development goes slowly with the pick.
That is a terrible idea. Richardson hasn’t shown enough to be a high first rounder. Morris might end up being good, but he has a lot of question marks. Hey, not knowing anything much except the article, I don't disagree personally, unless the Colts staff had same optimism as that. I'm not sold on the top 3 or 4 QBs who all have questions. The cost of trading up to gamble there that's being thrown out is extremely high.
|
|
|
Post by coastalcard on Jan 27, 2023 20:25:31 GMT -6
For crying out loud. The Panther owner goes and hires the Colts ex-coach. Maybe we can go get Wentz real cheap too.
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Jan 27, 2023 21:16:05 GMT -6
Reich getting an OC job seemed quite likely.
|
|
|
Post by williamtsherman on Feb 14, 2023 18:35:34 GMT -6
Steichen: "We're going to throw to score points and we're going to run to win."
So, what his is saying is....uh....what is he saying?
Are there some upcoming NFL rule changes that I haven't heard of? Changes in how the winner of a game is determined? And what would the opposite approach look like - running to score points and passing to win? Can someone describe what offenses would look like under these two opposing concepts? I have a feeling this maxim was concocted specifically to appeal to the drug-ravaged mind of Jim Irsay. Does it follow that on defense you also defend the pass to prevent points and defend the run to win?
Anyway, an OC or DC from one of the hot teams in the league is a pretty standard sort of hire. It's all happy talk on the first day, as always, but a lot of coaches never again reach the peak of esteem they experience the day they are hired. Time will tell.
|
|
|
Post by cardfan on Feb 14, 2023 20:27:27 GMT -6
Steichen: "We're going to throw to score points and we're going to run to win." So, what his is saying is....uh....what is he saying? Are there some upcoming NFL rule changes that I haven't heard of? Changes in how the winner of a game is determined? And what would the opposite approach look like - running to score points and passing to win? Can someone describe what offenses would look like under these two opposing concepts? I have a feeling this maxim was concocted specifically to appeal to the drug-ravaged mind of Jim Irsay. Does it follow that on defense you also defend the pass to prevent points and defend the run to win? Anyway, an OC or DC from one of the hot teams in the league is a pretty standard sort of hire. It's all happy talk on the first day, as always, but a lot of coaches never again reach the peak of esteem they experience the day they are hired. Time will tell. He’s saying they will throw to get leads and run to salt games away. I think.
|
|
|
Post by Lurkin McGurkin on Feb 15, 2023 7:20:48 GMT -6
Seems like someone who can adapt the offense to different types of QBs, and gets the most out of what he has. A little more "fire and brimstone" than Reich, which I like.
Better than recycling a has-been.
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Feb 15, 2023 7:56:40 GMT -6
Steichen: "We're going to throw to score points and we're going to run to win." So, what his is saying is....uh....what is he saying? He’s saying they will throw to get leads and run to salt games away. I think. Maybe saying running the ball successfully when you want to wins makes passing game work. Whatever it means, it beats losing by running the ball nowhere and passing it to the other team as the defense swarms the QB which was their trademark this year.
|
|
|
Post by bsu73 on Feb 15, 2023 13:45:58 GMT -6
Steichen: "We're going to throw to score points and we're going to run to win." So, what his is saying is....uh....what is he saying? Are there some upcoming NFL rule changes that I haven't heard of? Changes in how the winner of a game is determined? And what would the opposite approach look like - running to score points and passing to win? Can someone describe what offenses would look like under these two opposing concepts? I have a feeling this maxim was concocted specifically to appeal to the drug-ravaged mind of Jim Irsay. Does it follow that on defense you also defend the pass to prevent points and defend the run to win? Anyway, an OC or DC from one of the hot teams in the league is a pretty standard sort of hire. It's all happy talk on the first day, as always, but a lot of coaches never again reach the peak of esteem they experience the day they are hired. Time will tell. He’s saying they will throw to get leads and run to salt games away. I think. Just like Philadelphia did in Superbowl LVII? Going conservative in second halves of football when winning have resulted in a lot of losses.
|
|
|
Post by williamtsherman on Feb 15, 2023 16:58:18 GMT -6
Top 2022 passing team: Kansas City Chiefs
Top 2022 rushing team: Chicago Bears
So, you see, you can succeed either way. Either you win the Super Bowl or get the top draft pick.
|
|
|
Post by williamtsherman on Feb 18, 2023 11:47:35 GMT -6
Interesting data showing the salary of the top rusher on each recent super bowl winning team. Note that highest paid player on this list, Harvin, was actually a wide receiver and most of his value was in pass catching. For comparison, Jonathan Taylor is paid 4.3 million. Of course Ballard will likely raise and extend him since Ballard's #1 roster priority appears to be to prove to the world that he can over pay and over draft low-value positions and that nobody can stop him from doing that. Now, if I had the #32 ranked team and by far the worst offense in the league after 6 years of implementing my roster strategy, I might consider...you know...changing it. But that's just me.
|
|
|
Post by williamtsherman on Mar 6, 2023 7:15:06 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Lurkin McGurkin on Mar 6, 2023 10:36:25 GMT -6
Young measured in at just over 5'10". That is concerning. But considering the Colts just hired a coach used to working with undersized QBs, it wouldn't surprise me if they took Young.
I'd say the QB with the fewest concerns surrounding him is Stroud. Good at everything, great at some things. His deep throws were a mixed bag at the combine. I think with some good practice time with his receivers, could be a franchise QB for years.
Levis has kind of a Jeff George 2.0 feel about him. Throws everything at warp speed. No finesse. Not as mobile. A little arrogant. I hate to make the comparison, but... Ryan Leaf?
Richardson has a JaMarcus Russell feel. Off the charts talent, but doesn't know how to use it. Big, strong, can throw VERY deep. Had some really good deep throws on Saturday. VERY competitive. He could flourish in an RPO offense, but not sure that he can consistently carry a team in a pass-oriented offense. If he can be coached up to clean up his bad decision-making, he could be a generational talent.
I'm intrigued by Hendon Hooker. Assuming he recovers from his knee injury, that is.
But the combine QB that impressed me the most was Stetson Bennet. He made some great throws, and the guy knows how to win. His height is also a concern. Worth a 4th or 5th round pick. Maybe earlier.
The Bears will most likely try to work a trade with Houston. After getting what they can after that, they'll try to move back again with Indy, and still be able to get one of their top guys. The Bears could walk away with several second round picks this year and next. Load up on receivers and DBs.
|
|
|
Post by 00hmh on Mar 6, 2023 11:56:35 GMT -6
Your analysis is sound. Ky guy is risky, a Carson Wentz talent needing a lot of coaching.
Top 2, maybe 3 QBs all are pretty good. Even the Ky guy will probably go pretty high. Every one a risk. tOSU guy maybe safest. Bennet or Hooker could end up stars.
Bears with a #1 can convert it into the Colts pick, get the guy they need there and maybe get some great picks as they trade down twice this year, maybe a couple more #1s next year in the process. That's a very good haul.
Colts and the second QB in the draft without giving up as much for #1 looks good for them. Could get guy they consider best. Can't lose.
Sitting until 4 might even work if they like 3 QBs almost same but for different reasons?
|
|
|
Post by williamtsherman on Mar 6, 2023 19:18:58 GMT -6
Perhaps you guys missed my post above. I settled the matter by choosing Young as the best pick, based on my unassailable research.
|
|